August President Update Starting this month, Allison Martin Rhodes will be posting and circulating an information President’s Update. The first is attached here and sent to members via email and, in order to provide a place for comment and discussion, on the Forum.
Author Archive | Allison Martin Rhodes
CHICAGO (August 8, 2018) The Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers (APRL) is pleased to report that the American Bar Association (ABA) on Monday, August 6, 2018 adopted amendments to the lawyer advertising rules in the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. The new rules arose from APRL’s efforts and its 2015 Report of the APRL Regulation of Lawyer Advertising Committee. These newest changes will now be considered by many jurisdictions as replacements for their existing rules regulating lawyer advertising.
Press Release PRESS RELEASE ADVERTISING RULES APRL (002) (003)
Everything you need to know for the Chicago Annual Meeting can be found HERE
APRL began its efforts to change the ABA Model Rules on advertising over 4 years ago, issuing two detailed reports, and presetting APRL’s views in many arenas. The ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has now issued FINAL DAR Resolution and Report Advertising Report as Amended by Rules a… proposing changes to the Model Rules on advertising. That Report comes before the ABA House of Delegates for vote this August 5-6 in Chicago..
APRL asks that you urge adoption of the Report, contact delegates and ABA representatives that you know and help usher lawyer advertising into the 21st century. For more information, please contact any member of the advertising subcommittee, chaired by Mark Tuft, and including Lynda Shely, Art Lachman, Peter Jarvis, Bruce Johnson, Jim McCauley, Jan Jacobowitz and George Clark.
Here’s a short summary of the changes: 2018 ABA Advertising Rule Summary
Registration is open for the Vancouver BC mid-year meeting, February 1st – 3rd at the Coastal Coal Hotel. Come join us in the winter wonderland for a great meeting in a jaw-droppingly beautiful part of the world.
Join APRL for the highest quality collaboration and networking with fellow professional responsibility lawyers August 10-12 at the Westin Time Square.
APRL members Jim Bolan and Sara Holden have published the Massachusetts Legal Ethics and Malpractice 2017.
Navigate Massachusetts’ system of attorney regulation with this newest practice deskbook from the publishers of Law Journal Press, the American Lawyer and the National Law Journal. The book contains practical advice from the authors regarding Massachusetts Bar Discipline and Legal Malpractice.
This book is comprised of two main parts: Massachusetts Bar Discipline and Legal Malpractice.
Part One, Bar Discipline, details the investigative process and the prosecutorial process. Topics addressed include: Board of Overseers, Response to the Complaint, Diversion Program, Formal Charges, Possible Dispositions, Formal Proceedings, Discovery, Prosecuting the Petition, Review and Appeal and Proceedings Before Court. Also addressed are issues involving temporary suspension, disability inactive status, disbarment by consent, convictions, commissioners, costs and restitution, reinstatement and clearance letters.
Part Two addresses legal malpractice topics, including: Attorney-Client Relationship, Standard of Care and Proximate Cause, Damages, Expert Testimony, Other Claims (e.g., breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, interference with contractual relations), Defenses, and the Intersection Between Bar Discipline and Legal Malpractice.
Keep current with the law and rules concerning lawyer liability and discipline in Massachusetts, as they continue to develop and change, and as ethics committees constantly issue new opinions and guidelines.* The book contains helpful appendix material: Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct; Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers – Selected Citations; Ex Parte Communications – List of Selected Recent Cases, Rules, and Ethics Opinions in Massachusetts.
Today APRL welcomes 110 members to Miami Beach Florida for what will no doubt prove to be a great meeting. Details here and follow us on social media at #APRLMIAMI.
February 1, 2017
For Immediate Release APRL Press Release re Professor Painter
Professor Richard Painter, the Former Chief Ethics Lawyer for President George W. Bush, and Co-Counsel in the Constitution-Based Lawsuit Against President Trump, to Speak in Miami on Friday February 3, 2017, at the Lowes Miami Beach Hotel.
In the Journal Of Criminal Law and Criminology, APRL member Thomas Sullivan, together with Maurice Possley, published their article The Chronic Failure to Discipline Prosecutors for Misconduct: Proposals for Reform.
According to the abstract:
While most prosecutors adhere to the maxim that their primary task is to obtain just results, there are some who violate their ethical responsibilities in order to rack up convictions. This article describes the distressing, decades-long absence of discipline imposed on prosecutors whose knowing misconduct has resulted in terrible injustices being visited upon defendants throughout the country. Many honorable lawyers have failed to speak out about errant prosecutors, thus enabling their ethical breaches. The silent accessories include practicing lawyers and judges of trial and reviewing courts who, having observed prosecutorial misconduct, failed to take corrective action. Fault also lies with members of attorney disciplinary bodies who have not investigated widely publicized prosecutorial misconduct. This article summarizes the rules requiring all members of the bar to report unethical conduct. We focus particularly on lawyers who serve in prosecutors’ offices, defense lawyers, and trial and reviewing court judges and their lawyer clerks, each of whom has a personal, non-delegable responsibility to report their knowledge of ethical breaches to disciplinary authorities.
In addition, the article identifies reforms to the justice system designed to reduce prosecutorial abuses: (1) substituting for the Brady rule a verifiable open-file pretrial discovery requirement on prosecutors; (2) instead of invoking harmless error, requiring reversal of convictions if serious prosecutorial misconduct is proven; (3) identifying errant prosecutors by name in trial and appellate opinions; (4) providing prosecutors with qualified instead of complete immunity from civil damages for misconduct; and (5) authorizing the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General to handle investigations of alleged misconduct by federal prosecutors. The article also proposes that attorney disciplinary bodies adopt changes designed to more effectively discover and sanction misbehaving prosecutors. Lawyer organizations and bar associations are urged to speak out when prosecutors deviate from appropriate conduct, and law schools are encouraged to include instruction on ethical rules peculiar to the criminal practice.
Thomas P. Sullivan and Maurice Possley, The Chronic Failure to Discipline Prosecutors for Misconduct: Proposals for Reform, 105 J. Crim. L. & Criminology (2015).